Jon Cooksey, one of the best problem presenters I know,
sent our group a letter that said
our views of our "problem" and "solving behaviors"
did not include the truths known by
women,
poor people, and
people who live closer to mother earth.
Jon showed me that
all of us are facing the overpopulation problem with
only part of the truth.
I realized that if we knew more of the truth
the problem would appear blacker.
So I wrote him this letter.
Dear Jon,
You are a brilliant presenter of truths.
When you are done presenting the truths,
(on which you focus)
people know there is a problem.
However,
They may not know the whole problem.
They may not know that
they grasp less then 10% of the problem.
They may not know how much injury will occur and
how quickly it will occur.
The listeners to whom you have successfully communicated
don't think their grocery store will have empty shelves
during their lifetimes or
that hungry mobs will be in their neighborhood
breaking down doors.
They don't think they will face people,
who will want to kill them or
who they will have to kill.
They don't think that most people,
who survive a round of conflict,
won't have enough to eat to stay alive.
Actually, no one knows the dates of these events, but we do know
the longer we stay on our current path
the bigger the crash
the faster it will unfold
the less we will be able to protect our children.
Your listener does know that
when these events happen to us "the haves,"
the events will already have happened to "the have nots."
Most of the initial poor will have already perished.
However, starting today, as gasoline heads toward 4 dollars a gallon,
everyone's loaf of bread will double or triple in price.
The billion people that are living on a dollar or two each day
will be unable to buy bread in their market, and
will starve to death.
Your presentation failed to tell the listener that
his or her daily newscast
will be filled with stories of starvation and conflict.
Your presentation failed to tell the listener that
these stories will continue for decades.
O yes, your forgot to include in your truths,
that, while these billions are starving,
fighting for food, and fleeing,
we ("the haves" of the world) will be their chief murderers.
We will take the food out of their markets and eat it
or put it in our gas tanks.
And when they come for it we will kill them.
Your truths fail to include all the names we can call
"starving people trying to keep their kids alive."
They are called,
ghetto people.
unemployed
homeless,
temporally workers,
illegal immigrants,
unruly refugees,
revolutionaries, terrorists,
insurgents, and
rebel armies in exile.
Your truth does not include that
the listener's heat, light, food, and transport bills
will first double and
then triple
as cheap energy disappears.
Your picture does not include that families will have
progressively smaller incomes --
that eventually they will not be able to pay their bills.
They will become:
"starving people trying to keep their kids alive."
Where are these truths in the pictures you and most others are painting?
How does a listener of truth know what truth is missing?
How do they tell the difference between a truth which
is meaningless and
a truth which warrants attention?
Where does a person get the truth that
grabs them by the throat and
shakes them into consciousness?
Where does the person get the truth that says,
"The human experiment is going to a place almost no one wants." ? |